← Reviews
Open accessFull analysisJun 24, 2026

Synbiotic (Pendulum WBF-038) and bone health in Caucasian postmenopausal women: rationale and design of the OsteoPreP trial

This is a trial protocol — no efficacy data were reported; the direction of effect on BMD and metabolic health remains insufficient pending trial completion.

Evidence levelCObservational / small clinical study
Study typerct
Sample160
Effect directionInsufficient
CertaintyLow
Clinical applicabilityLow
Overinterpretation risk1/5 · Low
PICO
Population160 Caucasian postmenopausal women aged 40–65, without diagnosed osteoporosis, hypertension, or diabetes, residing in Melbourne, Australia
InterventionOral synbiotic Pendulum WBF-038 (Akkermansia muciniphila, Anaerobutyricum hallii, Clostridium butyricum, C. beijerinckii, Bifidobacterium infantis Bi26 + chicory inulin) for 12 months
ComparatorIdentical oral placebo for 12 months (double-blind)
OutcomeBone mineral density (DXA); Bone remodeling markers; Glycaemic parameters (fasting glucose, OGTT); Body composition (lean and fat mass); Muscle function; Cognition; Gut microbiota composition

Summary of findings

OutcomeEffect95% CICertaintyClinical relevanceNotes
Bone mineral density (DXA)not yet reported — protocol onlyLow
Bone remodeling markersnot yet reported — protocol onlyLow
Glycaemic parameters (fasting glucose, OGTT)not yet reported — protocol onlyLow
Body composition (lean and fat mass)not yet reported — protocol onlyLow
Muscle functionnot yet reported — protocol onlyLow
Cognitionnot yet reported — protocol onlyLow
Gut microbiota compositionnot yet reported — protocol onlyLow

Context

Osteoporosis affects 200 million women globally; only 30% of high-risk Australian women receive specific treatment. Gut microbiota influences bone metabolism via short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), especially butyrate, which regulates osteoclasts and regulatory T cells. No prior RCT has tested this specific five-strain probiotic plus inulin combination over 12 months in women at risk of osteoporosis.

What the study showed

The article describes exclusively the trial rationale and protocol; no efficacy or safety results were presented. Planned sample size is n=160 (80 per arm), with a musculoskeletal subgroup of 30 participants for OGTT and regulatory T-cell counts. Primary outcome data (BMD by DXA) will be obtained after 12 months of intervention.

How it was done

Double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT with 1:1 allocation via block randomization (80 blocks, 2 per block). Assessments at baseline and five follow-up visits over 12 months. Partial sponsorship from Pendulum Therapeutics Inc., which also generated the randomization list — a relevant risk of bias to be assessed with RoB 2 after publication of results.

Effect magnitude

No calculable effect size; the article provides only the sample size calculation (n=160 to detect a clinically meaningful difference in BMD), with no outcome data.

Risk of bias

Protocol without efficacy data: no conclusions about effect can be drawn at this stage. Recruitment restricted to Caucasian women in Melbourne limits generalizability. Industrial sponsor (Pendulum Therapeutics) generated the randomization and supplies the product, representing a structural conflict of interest — RoB 2 tool must be applied to the final report. Musculoskeletal subgroup (n=30) is insufficient for confirmatory analyses.

Interpretation limit

What this study does NOT prove

This study does NOT prove efficacy, safety, or any direction of effect of the synbiotic on BMD or metabolic parameters — it is solely a protocol. It is not generalizable to non-Caucasian women, men, or women with established osteoporosis.

In clinical practice

No change in clinical practice is justified based on this protocol. Clinicians should await publication of primary results before considering this synbiotic for osteoporosis prevention. Current use of probiotics/synbiotics for BMD in postmenopause carries at most grade C evidence.

Limitations

Protocol without efficacy data: no conclusions about effect can be drawn at this stage. Recruitment restricted to Caucasian women in Melbourne limits generalizability. Industrial sponsor (Pendulum Therapeutics) generated the randomization and supplies the product, representing a structural conflict of interest — RoB 2 tool must be applied to the final report. Musculoskeletal subgroup (n=30) is insufficient for confirmatory analyses.

What is still missing

Publication of primary and secondary results of OsteoPreP after completion of 12-month follow-up. Individual participant data meta-analyses will be needed to confirm generalizability to other ethnic groups and age ranges.

Technical appendix

Version history

  • 1.0 · 2026-06-24 — Auto-generated under Evidence Standard v1.0
Source: DOI 10.3390/nu16234219 · 2024

Microbiota Weekly

The week in microbiota evidence, in your language. Structured summaries, traceable to the source.