← Reviews
Open accessFull analysisNov 4, 2026

Shotgun Metagenomic Characterization of Skin Microbiome Shifts in Human Scabies Before and After Scabicidal Treatment

Scabicidal treatment with permethrin was associated with increased alpha diversity and reduced microbial burden at moist sites, but no taxonomic or functional difference survived correction for multiple testing.

Evidence levelDNarrative / animal / in vitro / mechanistic
Study typeobservational
Sample—
Effect directionInsufficient
CertaintyVery low
Clinical applicabilityVery low
Overinterpretation risk1/5 · Low
PECO
PopulationPatients with clinically confirmed active scabies
ExposureShotgun metagenomic sequencing before and after scabicidal treatment (permethrin)
ComparatorSame-site (moist) pre- vs. post-treatment samples; dry vs. moist sites pre-treatment
OutcomeAlpha diversity (Shannon/Simpson) at moist sites post- vs. pre-treatment; Beta-diversity community composition (PERMANOVA) moist sites post- vs. pre-treatment; Total microbial burden (non-host/non-mite read fraction) post- vs. pre-treatment; Bacterial burden (bacterial reads) post- vs. pre-treatment; Genus/species-level taxonomic differences (post- vs. pre-treatment, FDR-corrected); Predicted functional pathway abundance (post- vs. pre-treatment, FDR-corrected); Fungal/archaeal burden post- vs. pre-treatment

Summary of findings

OutcomeEffect95% CICertaintyClinical relevanceNotes
Alpha diversity (Shannon/Simpson) at moist sites post- vs. pre-treatmentShannon p=0.0297; Simpson p=0.0177; in the effect size or 95% CI reported—Very low—1 studies
Beta-diversity community composition (PERMANOVA) moist sites post- vs. pre-treatmentPERMANOVA p=0.029; in the effect size or 95% CI reported—Very low—1 studies
Total microbial burden (non-host/non-mite read fraction) post- vs. pre-treatmentp=0.0124; in the effect size or 95% CI reported—Very low—1 studies
Bacterial burden (bacterial reads) post- vs. pre-treatmentp<0.05; in the effect size or 95% CI reported—Very low—1 studies
Genus/species-level taxonomic differences (post- vs. pre-treatment, FDR-corrected)minimum BH-FDR adjusted p=0.594 (genus), 0.557 (species); in the taxon met FDR threshold—Very low—1 studies
Predicted functional pathway abundance (post- vs. pre-treatment, FDR-corrected)minimum BH-FDR adjusted p=0.116; in the pathway met FDR threshold—Very low—1 studies
Fungal/archaeal burden post- vs. pre-treatmentp>0.1; in the effect size or 95% CI reported—Very low—1 studies

Context

Scabies affects hundreds of millions globally and is associated with cutaneous dysbiosis, Staphylococcus predominance, and secondary infection risk. The molecular basis of microbiome changes during and after treatment was previously unknown. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing enables simultaneous characterization of bacteria, fungi, viruses, and archaea from clinical samples.

What the study showed

Alpha diversity was higher in post-treatment moist-site samples vs. pre-treatment (Shannon p=0.0297; Simpson p=0.0177), with a difference in community composition (PERMANOVA p=0.029). Total microbial burden was significantly lower post-treatment (p=0.0124), driven by reductions in bacterial and viral reads (p<0.05 for both). No genus- or species-level taxonomic difference, and no functional pathway, survived BH-FDR correction (minimum adjusted p: 0.594 at genus; 0.557 at species; 0.116 for pathways). Staphylococcus was the dominant pre-treatment genus, with a relative decrease of 33.58% post-treatment, but without corrected statistical significance.

How it was done

Longitudinal observational study using shotgun metagenomic sequencing of skin samples from scabies patients, collected at dry (Pre-DR) and moist (Pre-MO) sites before treatment and at moist sites after treatment (Post-MO). Analysis included cross-domain taxonomic profiling and functional pathway prediction (HUMAnN). Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction was applied for multiple comparisons.

Effect magnitude

No effect sizes with 95% CI were reported for taxonomic or functional comparisons; diversity and microbial burden differences were expressed as p-values only, without standardized effect measures or confidence intervals.

Risk of bias

Extremely small sample size (n not clearly specified in the provided text, suggesting fewer than 20 participants), no healthy skin control group, no post-treatment dry-site samples, absence of negative controls to distinguish environmental contamination from true colonization (e.g., Botrytis cinerea). No formal risk-of-bias tool applied; observational design without randomization precludes causal inference. Exploratory taxonomic comparisons based on unadjusted p-values lack inferential validity.

Interpretation limit

What this study does NOT prove

This study does not prove that scabicidal treatment restores the skin microbiome to a healthy state, nor that the observed taxonomic changes are causally linked to scabies pathophysiology or treatment mechanism of action. Results are not generalizable without replication in larger, adequately controlled samples.

In clinical practice

The data do not support modification of current clinical practice. The finding of Staphylococcus aureus as the dominant pre-treatment taxon is consistent with the clinically recognized secondary infection risk, but without adjusted risk quantification. Monitoring for secondary bacterial infection remains indicated by existing practice, not by this study.

Limitations

Extremely small sample size (n not clearly specified in the provided text, suggesting fewer than 20 participants), no healthy skin control group, no post-treatment dry-site samples, absence of negative controls to distinguish environmental contamination from true colonization (e.g., Botrytis cinerea). No formal risk-of-bias tool applied; observational design without randomization precludes causal inference. Exploratory taxonomic comparisons based on unadjusted p-values lack inferential validity.

What is still missing

Studies with a healthy skin control group, adequately powered samples, paired pre- and post-treatment samples at both anatomical sites, collection negative controls, and functional analyses linked to clinical outcomes.

Technical appendix

Version history

  • 1.0 · 2026-11-04 — Auto-generated under Evidence Standard v1.0
Source: DOI 10.3390/ijms27188397 · 2026

Microbiota Weekly

The week in microbiota evidence, in your language. Structured summaries, traceable to the source.