← Reviews
Open accessFull analysisSep 15, 2026

Repurposing antimicrobial agents for neuroprotection: mechanisms, clinical potential, and challenges

This narrative review concludes that antimicrobials such as minocycline, doxycycline, macrolides, and antimalarials show neuroprotective effects in preclinical models, but human clinical evidence is scarce, inconsistent, and insufficient to support therapeutic recommendations.

Evidence levelDNarrative / animal / in vitro / mechanistic
Study typenarrative_review
Sample
Effect directionInsufficient
CertaintyVery low
Clinical applicabilityVery low
Overinterpretation risk1/5 · Low
PICO
PopulationPatients with neurological diseases (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, ALS, stroke, MS, epilepsy, spinal cord injury) or corresponding animal models
InterventionRepurposed antimicrobial agents (minocycline, doxycycline, macrolides, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, dapsone, ivermectin, niclosamide)
ComparatorPlacebo, vehicle, or no treatment (experimental models); in some clinical trials, placebo-controlled
OutcomeFunctional progression in ALS (ALSFRS-R); Conversion to definite MS in clinically isolated syndrome; Microglial activation and pro-inflammatory cytokines (animal models); Infarct volume and neurological deficit in stroke models; Dopaminergic neuronal loss in Parkinson models; Functional recovery after spinal cord injury (animal models and clinical trials); Clinical adverse events (tolerability of high doses in ALS)

Summary of findings

OutcomeEffect95% CICertaintyClinical relevanceNotes
Functional progression in ALS (ALSFRS-R)MD -1.30 ALSFRS-R points (minocycline vs placebo), 95% CI not reported; n=412, phase III RCTModerate1 studies
Conversion to definite MS in clinically isolated syndromeabsolute risk difference ~27.1 percentage points (33.9% vs 61.0%), 95% CI not reported; n=44, RCTLow1 studies
Microglial activation and pro-inflammatory cytokines (animal models)direction consistently favorable across multiple animal models; in the pooled effect size availableVery low
Infarct volume and neurological deficit in stroke modelsdirection favorable in animal models (3-45 mg/kg); in the pooled effect size; in the clinical RCT data reportedVery low
Dopaminergic neuronal loss in Parkinson modelsdirection favorable in MPTP animal models (30-120 mg/kg); in the clinical RCT data reportedVery low
Functional recovery after spinal cord injury (animal models and clinical trials)mixed direction: favorable in some animal models; in the significant improvement in cervical contusion rat model (90 mg/kg x 3d); clinical data insufficientLow
Clinical adverse events (tolerability of high doses in ALS)mean tolerated dose 387 mg/day (target 400 mg/day); increased GI adverse events and elevated BUN/liver enzymes at high doses; n=23 crossover trialLow2 studies

Context

Neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, ALS, and stroke lack effective disease-modifying treatments. Drug repurposing of agents with known safety profiles represents a faster and less costly development strategy. Antimicrobials with anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties have been investigated in this context.

What the study showed

In animal models, minocycline consistently reduces microglial activation, pro-inflammatory cytokines, infarct volume, and dopaminergic neuronal loss. In human ALS, a phase III RCT (n=412) showed functional worsening in the minocycline group versus placebo (ALSFRS-R: −1.30 additional points, 95% CI not reported in the source text). In clinically isolated syndrome (RCT, n=44), minocycline reduced conversion to definite MS at 2 years: 61.0% in placebo versus 33.9% in the minocycline group (absolute difference of 27.1 percentage points; RR not specified by the study). Most clinical data derive from small, pilot, or phase II studies without statistical power for definitive outcomes.

How it was done

Non-systematic narrative review synthesizing preclinical evidence (in vitro and in vivo rodent models) and clinical evidence (phase I–III trials, pilot studies, case series) on multiple antimicrobials across various neurological diseases. No registered protocol, explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria, reported systematic search, or formal risk-of-bias assessment of included studies. Duration of individual studies ranges from weeks to years.

Effect magnitude

The only clinical magnitude data with a clear unfavorable direction is the ALS RCT (n=412): minocycline accelerated functional decline by −1.30 points on the ALSFRS-R versus placebo. For MS (n=44), the absolute reduction in conversion was 27.1 percentage points in favor of minocycline, but the 95% CI was not provided in the source text.

Risk of bias

This is a narrative review without systematic methodology and without applied risk-of-bias tools (no RoB 2, ROBINS-I, or AMSTAR-2). Most neuroprotective data derive from animal models with unestablished translational validity. Cited clinical trials are heterogeneous in population, dose, duration, and outcome, precluding quantitative synthesis. Implicit publication bias exists due to narrative study selection.

Interpretation limit

What this study does NOT prove

This review does not prove clinical efficacy of any antimicrobial as a neuroprotective agent in humans; preclinical data do not automatically translate into clinical benefit. Results are not generalizable to pediatric, elderly with comorbidities, or underrepresented ethnic populations in cited studies.

In clinical practice

No reviewed antimicrobial agent has sufficient clinical evidence to be recommended as a neuroprotective agent outside clinical trials. Clinicians should treat preclinical data as hypotheses, not as a basis for prescribing. Off-label use of minocycline in ALS is contraindicated by phase III RCT data.

Limitations

This is a narrative review without systematic methodology and without applied risk-of-bias tools (no RoB 2, ROBINS-I, or AMSTAR-2). Most neuroprotective data derive from animal models with unestablished translational validity. Cited clinical trials are heterogeneous in population, dose, duration, and outcome, precluding quantitative synthesis. Implicit publication bias exists due to narrative study selection.

What is still missing

Adequately powered phase III RCTs with standardized clinical outcomes and well-defined populations are needed for each specific neurological indication. Studies evaluating biological sex differences and optimized dosing regimens are absent.

Technical appendix

Version history

  • 1.0 · 2026-09-15 — Auto-generated under Evidence Standard v1.0
Source: DOI 10.1002/nep3.70042 · 2026

Microbiota Weekly

The week in microbiota evidence, in your language. Structured summaries, traceable to the source.