← Reviews
Open accessAnalysisOct 29, 2026

Microbiota and perimenopausal syndrome: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies (narrative review)

No reproducible gut dysbiosis pattern specific to perimenopausal syndrome has been established.

Evidence levelCObservational / small clinical study
Study typeother
Sample—
Effect directionInsufficient
CertaintyLow
Clinical applicabilityLow
Overinterpretation risk1/5 · Low
PICO
Population—
Intervention—
Comparator—
Outcome—

Context

Over 70% of perimenopausal women report symptoms such as hot flashes and anxiety. The gut microbiota is a mechanistically plausible candidate, but causal involvement remains unproven.

What the study showed

The review synthesized clinical and preclinical evidence and found that findings on microbial diversity and changes in specific taxa are inconsistent across studies. No specific dysbiosis profile for perimenopausal syndrome has been replicated. Ovarian aging and hormonal fluctuations may reshape the gut microbial ecosystem, and microbial enzymes and metabolites may interact bidirectionally with the host.

How it was done

Narrative review with targeted searches of PubMed and Web of Science covering publications through July 15, 2026. Human studies were prioritized; high-quality animal and mechanistic studies were included when clinical evidence was limited.

Risk of bias

This is a narrative, not a systematic review with meta-analysis, and is subject to selection bias and methodological heterogeneity of included studies. This analysis is based solely on the available abstract without access to the full text.

Interpretation limit

What this study does NOT prove

This study does not demonstrate causality between microbiota alterations and perimenopausal symptoms, nor efficacy of any microbial intervention in this population.

In clinical practice

There is insufficient evidence to recommend microbiota-targeted interventions as treatment for perimenopausal syndrome. Clinical use of probiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation for this indication lacks robust evidentiary support.

Limitations

This is a narrative, not a systematic review with meta-analysis, and is subject to selection bias and methodological heterogeneity of included studies. This analysis is based solely on the available abstract without access to the full text.

Technical appendix

Version history

  • 1.0 · 2026-10-29 — Auto-generated under Evidence Standard v1.0
Source: DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s631942 · 2026

Microbiota Weekly

The week in microbiota evidence, in your language. Structured summaries, traceable to the source.