← Reviews
Open accessFull analysisJun 16, 2026

Gut microbiota and coronary microvascular dysfunction in obesity: narrative review of mechanisms

This narrative review proposes that gut dysbiosis mediates obesity-induced coronary microvascular dysfunction via metabolites such as TMAO and SCFAs, but provides no original primary data to establish causality.

The question (PICO)
PopulationAdults with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) at risk of coronary microvascular dysfunction
InterventionGut microbiota dysbiosis and its metabolites (TMAO, SCFAs, LPS, bile acids)
ComparatorNon-obese individuals or those with eubiotic microbiota (implicit in review)
OutcomeCoronary microvascular dysfunction assessed by coronary flow reserve (CFR), myocardial blood flow (MBF), and markers of inflammation/endothelial dysfunction
DEvidence
Study
Review
Effect
Insufficient
Summary of findings by outcome
OutcomeGradeDirectionEffectStudies
Coronary flow reserve (CFR) in obese individualsB Unfavorablereducao 47.7% IC -80.2/-15.2 (meta-analise citada, n=422)1
Stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) in obese individualsB Unfavorablereducao 47.8% IC -73.7/-21.8 (meta-analise citada, n=409)1
Cardiovascular event risk per CFR unit decreaseB UnfavorableHR 1.95 IC 1.41/2.69 (estudo longitudinal citado, n=827)1
Resting myocardial blood flow (MBF) in obese individualsB Neutraldiferenca 15% IC -24/+53 (nao significativo, meta-analise citada)1
Role of TMAO in coronary endothelial dysfunctionD Insufficientmecanistico; sem efeito quantificado em humanos nesta revisao
Role of SCFAs in inflammation and vascular functionD Insufficientmecanistico; sem efeito quantificado em humanos nesta revisao
Gut microbiota diversity in obesityC Unfavorablereducao de diversidade em obesos vs eutróficos; sem efeito quantificado agregado
Coronary flow reserve (CFR) in obese individualsB
Direction Unfavorable
Effectreducao 47.7% IC -80.2/-15.2 (meta-analise citada, n=422)
Studies1
Stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) in obese individualsB
Direction Unfavorable
Effectreducao 47.8% IC -73.7/-21.8 (meta-analise citada, n=409)
Studies1
Cardiovascular event risk per CFR unit decreaseB
Direction Unfavorable
EffectHR 1.95 IC 1.41/2.69 (estudo longitudinal citado, n=827)
Studies1
Resting myocardial blood flow (MBF) in obese individualsB
Direction Neutral
Effectdiferenca 15% IC -24/+53 (nao significativo, meta-analise citada)
Studies1
Role of TMAO in coronary endothelial dysfunctionD
Direction Insufficient
Effectmecanistico; sem efeito quantificado em humanos nesta revisao
Studies
Role of SCFAs in inflammation and vascular functionD
Direction Insufficient
Effectmecanistico; sem efeito quantificado em humanos nesta revisao
Studies
Gut microbiota diversity in obesityC
Direction Unfavorable
Effectreducao de diversidade em obesos vs eutróficos; sem efeito quantificado agregado
Studies

Context

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) occurs in obese patients even without large-vessel obstruction and predicts major cardiovascular events. The gut microbiota has emerged as a potential link between obesity and CMD, but mechanisms remain largely inferred from heterogeneous studies. Understanding this pathway is relevant as half of all adults globally may have obesity by 2050.

What the study showed

The review cites a meta-analysis (n=1,399; 456 obese) showing a 47.7% reduction in CFR in obese individuals (n=422; 95% CI −80.2% to −15.2%) and a 47.8% reduction in stress MBF (n=409; 95% CI −73.7% to −21.8%), with no significant difference in resting MBF (15%; 95% CI −24% to +53%). A longitudinal study of 827 patients (median follow-up 5.6 years) reported a negative correlation between CFR and BMI (p<0.0001) and that each 1-unit decrease in CFR nearly doubled cardiovascular event risk (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.41–2.69). Proposed mechanisms involve TMAO, SCFAs, LPS, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, but the review presents no primary data directly linking microbiota to CMD.

How it was done

Narrative review without a registered protocol, without a described systematic search, and without explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria. Integrates data from meta-analyses, longitudinal studies, experimental models, and in vitro studies non-systematically. No primary data collection.

Effect magnitude

Highest-magnitude data come from cited studies: ~48% reduction in CFR and stress MBF in obese individuals (wide CIs) and HR 1.95 (95% CI 1.41–2.69) for cardiovascular events per unit CFR decrease. These figures do not derive from the review's own methodology.

Limitations

Narrative review without systematic methodology (AMSTAR-2 not applicable), with high risk of selection and confirmation bias. Does not distinguish causality from association between microbiota and CMD. Most mechanistic evidence derives from animal or in vitro models with limited direct clinical translation.

In clinical practice

Clinicians should recognize CMD as a relevant entity in obese patients with normal angiography. No microbiota-targeted intervention has sufficient evidence for clinical recommendation based on this review alone. Monitoring CFR in obese patients with ischemic symptoms is supported by the cited studies, not by this article itself.

What is still missing

Randomized controlled trials testing microbiota modulation (probiotics, prebiotics, fecal transplant) on measurable CMD outcomes in obese populations. Mechanistic studies in humans establishing causality between specific microbial metabolites and CFR.

Microbiota Weekly

The week in microbiota evidence, in your language. Structured summaries, traceable to the source.