← Reviews
Jul 23, 2026

Cost-effectiveness of Commercial or Traditional Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection

Colonoscopy-delivered FMT is the dominant cost-effective strategy for rCDI; FDA-approved commercial microbiota therapeutics were not cost-effective under any modeled circumstance when donor-derived FMT is available.

Evidence levelCObservational / small clinical study
Study typeother
Sample
Effect directionFavorable
CertaintyLow
Clinical applicabilityLow
Overinterpretation risk1/5 · Low
PICO
Population
Intervention
Comparator
Outcome

What the study showed

A Markov model estimated an ICER of $44,158 per QALY for colonoscopy-delivered FMT, which was optimal in 70% of simulations at a $100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. Commercial FDA-approved microbiota products did not achieve cost-effectiveness under any simulated scenario when traditional FMT was available. The study relies on externally sourced efficacy data rather than primary clinical outcomes.

How it was done

Markov model simulating a cohort of rCDI patients, using cure, recurrence, and mortality estimates from national guidelines and published literature. Primary outcomes were QALYs and ICERs.

Risk of bias

Economic modeling study — generates no primary clinical evidence. Model parameters depend on third-party published data subject to variability and potential selection bias; real-world availability of colonoscopy-based FMT differs across health systems.

Interpretation limit

What this study does NOT prove

The study does not demonstrate clinical superiority of traditional FMT over commercial products, only an economic advantage within the model's assumptions.

In clinical practice

Where colonoscopy-delivered FMT is accessible, this analysis supports its economic preference over commercial products. Clinical decisions must also weigh local availability, infrastructure, and patient-specific factors.

Limitations

Economic modeling study — generates no primary clinical evidence. Model parameters depend on third-party published data subject to variability and potential selection bias; real-world availability of colonoscopy-based FMT differs across health systems.

Technical appendix

Version history

  • 1.0 · 2026-07-23 — Auto-generated under Evidence Standard v1.0
Source: DOI 10.1093/cid/ciag263 · 2026

Paid access: structured summary from public metadata; consult the original study at the source.

Microbiota Weekly

The week in microbiota evidence, in your language. Structured summaries, traceable to the source.