← Reviews
Jul 16, 2026

CaHMB supplementation during caloric restriction in adults with obesity: a randomized controlled trial

Calcium beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (CaHMB) supplementation preserved skeletal muscle mass over 12 weeks of energy restriction in Chinese adults with obesity.

Evidence levelBRandomized clinical trial
Study typerct
Sample102
Effect directionFavorable
CertaintyModerate
Clinical applicabilityModerate
Overinterpretation risk1/5 · Low
PICO
Population
Intervention
Comparator
Outcome

What the study showed

The CaHMB group maintained skeletal muscle mass (median +0.7 kg), whereas the control group lost muscle (median -0.6 kg), yielding a between-group difference of 1.3 kg (95% CI: 0.5–1.9; p < 0.001). A greater proportion of CaHMB participants gained ≥ 0.5 kg of muscle mass (52.9% vs. 11.8%; OR = 8.44). Secondary outcomes related to visceral fat and metabolic biomarkers are referenced in the abstract but full data are unavailable.

How it was done

Double-blind RCT enrolling 102 Chinese adults with obesity (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m²), randomized 1:1 to CaHMB-enriched supplement (65 g/day; 3.0 g/day CaHMB; 24 g/day protein) or isocaloric maltodextrin control for 12 weeks under standardized dietary restriction. Primary outcome assessed by multifrequency bioelectrical impedance; intention-to-treat analysis.

Risk of bias

The sample is exclusively Chinese (n = 102), restricting generalizability to other ethnicities. Multifrequency BIA is less precise than DEXA or MRI for muscle mass quantification, and full-text access is unavailable to evaluate secondary outcomes and safety data.

Interpretation limit

What this study does NOT prove

This trial does not prove that CaHMB improves long-term functional outcomes, prevents sarcopenia, or outperforms other muscle-preservation strategies beyond the studied population.

In clinical practice

Results suggest CaHMB plus protein may attenuate muscle loss during hypocaloric dieting in obesity, but clinical adoption should await replication in diverse populations using imaging-based body composition methods.

Limitations

The sample is exclusively Chinese (n = 102), restricting generalizability to other ethnicities. Multifrequency BIA is less precise than DEXA or MRI for muscle mass quantification, and full-text access is unavailable to evaluate secondary outcomes and safety data.

Technical appendix

Version history

  • 1.0 · 2026-07-16 — Auto-generated under Evidence Standard v1.0
Source: DOI 10.1002/jcsm.70343 · 2026

Paid access: structured summary from public metadata; consult the original study at the source.

Microbiota Weekly

The week in microbiota evidence, in your language. Structured summaries, traceable to the source.