← Reviews
Open accessFull analysisJun 16, 2026

B. lactis BLa80 reduces eczema and respiratory infections in high-risk infants: 180-day RCT

Daily B. lactis BLa80 supplementation (5×10⁹ CFU) favored reduction of eczema (27.6% vs. 69.5%, RR 0.398) and upper respiratory tract infections (19.4% vs. 42.5%, RR 0.457) in high-allergy-risk infants compared to placebo.

The question (PICO)
Population360 formula-fed infants and children aged < 3 years with elevated allergy risk
InterventionB. animalis subsp. lactis BLa80, 5×10⁹ CFU/day, oral, for 180 days
ComparatorIdentical placebo for 180 days
OutcomePrimary: eczema incidence and symptom burden; Secondary: upper respiratory infections, GI symptoms, fecal microbiota (16S rRNA), metabolic pathways (KEGG), fecal immune markers (sIgA, calprotectin, beta-defensin-2)
BEvidence
Study
Randomized controlled trial
Sample
360
Effect
Favorable
Duration
180 days

Context

Eczema and respiratory infections are the primary early manifestations of the atopic march and impose substantial healthcare burden. Gut microbiome modulation by strain-specific probiotics is an active mechanistic hypothesis, but evidence remains heterogeneous. This RCT tests a specific strain with simultaneous clinical, microbiome, and fecal immunological outcomes.

What the study showed

Eczema incidence was 27.6% in the probiotic group vs. 69.5% in placebo (RR 0.398; p<0.001), an absolute risk reduction of 41.9 percentage points. Upper respiratory infections occurred in 19.4% vs. 42.5% (RR 0.457; p<0.001), absolute reduction of 23.1 p.p. The study did not report 95% CI for either RR. Fecal immune markers showed increased sIgA (p<0.001) and reduced calprotectin (p<0.001) in the probiotic group; absolute values and effect sizes were not provided in the available text.

How it was done

Double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT registered at ChiCTR2300074956; 360 participants enrolled over 180 days. Population restricted to formula-fed infants with elevated allergy risk, excluding breastfed infants, limiting generalizability.

Effect magnitude

RR 0.398 for eczema and RR 0.457 for URTI (both p<0.001); 95% CI not reported in available text. Absolute reductions of 41.9 and 23.1 p.p. are clinically large if confirmed with CI.

Limitations

Absence of 95% CI for primary outcomes prevents complete precision assessment. Risk of bias was not assessed using a standardized tool (RoB 2) in the available excerpt. Exclusive enrollment of high-risk formula-fed infants limits applicability to general-risk or breastfed populations. The 180-day follow-up does not support conclusions on long-term persistence or atopic march impact. Chinese registry (ChiCTR) without verifiable allocation concealment detail.

In clinical practice

Clinicians may consider B. lactis BLa80 for high-allergy-risk formula-fed infants, with expected reduction in eczema and URTI incidence during the supplementation period. 95% CI are unavailable, and strain-specific effects cannot be extrapolated to other Bifidobacterium strains. Awaiting full publication with safety data and intention-to-treat analysis is advisable.

What is still missing

RCTs including breastfed infants and general-risk populations are needed to extend applicability. Post-intervention follow-up ≥12 months is required to assess effect persistence and atopic march impact.

Microbiota Weekly

The week in microbiota evidence, in your language. Structured summaries, traceable to the source.